talks.bib

@inproceedings{AngeleMalsburg2015Psychonomics,
  author = {Bernhard Angele and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Multiple comparisons and false positive rates in eye tracking studies of reading behavior},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Pre-Psychonomics Word Recognition Conference}},
  year = {2015},
  editor = {Pablo Gomez and William Krenzer},
  address = {Chicago, IL, USA},
  organization = {DePaul University, Chicago},
  publisher = {DePaul University, Chicago},
}
@inproceedings{AngeleMalsburg2015SymPsych,
  author = {Angele, Bernhard and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {False-positive rates in eyetracking studies with multiple dependent measures},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 12th Symposium of Psycholinguistics}},
  year = {2015},
  editor = {Perea, Manuel and Vergara-Martínez, Marta and Rosa Martínez, Eva M. and Tejero, Pilar and Roca Ruíz, Javier and Fajardo, Inmaculada and Salmerón, Ladislao and Abu Mallouh, Reem},
  address = {Valencia, Spain},
  publisher = {Universitat de Valencia},
  keywords = {reading, method, false positives, Bonferroni correction}
}
@inproceedings{AngeleMalsburg2016Psychonomics,
  author = {Bernhard Angele and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Multiple Comparisons and False Positive Rates in Eye Tracking Studies of Reading Behaviour},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society}},
  year = {2016},
  editor = {Bajo, Maria Teresa},
  pages = 112,
  month = apr,
  address = {Granada, Spain},
  publisher = {Psychonomic Society},
}
@inproceedings{BoyceEtAl2019CUNY,
  author = {Veronica Boyce and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Till Poppels and Roger Levy},
  title = {Remember ‘him’, forget ‘her’: {Gender} bias in the comprehension of pronominal referents},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 32th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2019},
  editor = {Eliana Colunga and Albert Kim and Laura Michaelis and Bhuvana Narasimhan},
  month = mar,
  address = {Boulder, CO, USA},
  publisher = {University of Colorado Boulder},
  pdf = {BoyceEtAl2019CUNY.pdf},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgAngele2015AMLaP,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Angele, Bernhard},
  title = {The rules of statistics make no exception for reading research: {False} positive rates in eyetracking studies of reading behavior},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 21th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference ({AMLaP})}},
  year = {2015},
  editor = {Albert Gatt and Holger Mitterer},
  address = {Valetta, Malta},
  publisher = {University of Malta},
  keywords = {reading, method, false positives, Bonferroni correction}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2009SIGDIAL,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Baumann, Timo and Schlangen, David},
  title = {{TELIDA}: {A} package for manipulation and visualization of timed linguistic data},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the SIGDIAL 2009 Conference: The 10th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue}},
  year = {2009},
  pages = {302--305},
  address = {London, UK},
  organization = {Association for Computational Linguistics},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2012Coling,
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Shravan Vasishth and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title = {Scanpaths in reading are informative about sentence processing},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the First Workshop on Eye-tracking and Natural Language Processing}},
  year = {2012},
  editor = {Michael Carl, Pushpak Bhattacharya and Kamal Kumar Choudhary},
  pages = {37--53},
  address = {Mumbai, India},
  publisher = {The COLING 2012 organizing committee},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  pdf = {MalsburgEtAl2012Coling.pdf},
  url = {https://aclanthology.org/W12-4904/},
  abstract = {Scanpaths, sequences of fixations of the eyes, have historically played an important role in eyetracking research but their use has remained highly limited until recently. Here, we summarize earlier research and argue that scanpaths are a valuable source of information for reading research, specifically in the study of sentence comprehension. We also discuss a freely available, open source scanpath analysis method that we used to evaluate theoretical claims about human parsing and about how the parser guides the eyes during reading. This scanpath analysis is shown to yield new information that was missed when traditional approaches were used to study theories about eye guidance during garden-pathing. We also show how relatively subtle scanpath effects can be detected when we report the scanpath analysis of a large eyetracking corpus. In sum, we argue that scanpath analyses are likely to serve as an increasingly important tool in reading research, and perhaps also in other areas where eyetracking is used, e.g., in studies using the visual world paradigm.}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2013ECEM_scanpaths,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Shravan Vasishth and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title = {Scanpaths in reading are tractable and informative},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)}},
  year = {2013},
  editor = {Holmqvist, Kenneth and Mulvey, F. and Johansson, Roger},
  pages = {132},
  address = {Lund, Sweden},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  keywords = {scanpaths, reading, sentence processing},
  abstract = {Pioneering work in reading research has shown that scanpaths in reading can be informative about sentences processing (Frazier, Rayner, 1982). Nevertheless, scanpaths have not gained much traction in reading research. One reason for that may have been a lack of suitable analytical tools. Here, we summarize three recent studies in which we used a new scanpath measure to analyze gaze data from two experimental studies (von der Malsburg, Vasishth, 2011, 2012) and one corpus study (von der Malsburg, Kliegl, Vasishth, under revision). The experiments investigated how readers process temporarily ambiguous sentences. We showed that readers do not always commit to one of the alternative interpretations, and that readers with low working-memory capacity do so less often. Contrary to what was reported earlier, we found that reparsing instead of targeted repair is a common strategy to recover from incorrect interpretations. Interestingly, these results did not emerge in an analysis using traditional word-based eyetracking measures showing their limitations. In the corpus study, we demonstrated how syntax, oculomotor constraints, and age of reader jointly determine the regularity of scanpaths. We argue that, taken together, these results establish the scanpath as an informative and tractable object of investigation in reading research.},
  venue = {Lund University}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017CUNY,
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  title = {The president will give her inauguration speech: Explicit belief and implicit expectations in language production and comprehension},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 30th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2017},
  editor = {Edward Gibson and Idan Blank and Evelina Fedorenko and Richard Futrell and Melissa Kline and Rachel Ryskin},
  month = mar,
  address = {Boston, MA, USA},
  publisher = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
  note = {Talk on Youtube: https://youtu.be/KbmXYgqqydQ?t=14292},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  keywords = {sentence processing, language production, gender stereotypes, pronouns, expectation},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017DETEC,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  title = {The president gave her inauguration speech. {No}, they didn’t! {The} interaction of explicit world knowledge, implicit gender stereotypes, and discourse expectations},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of {Discourse Expectations: Theoretical, Experimental and Computational perspectives (DETEC 2017)}}},
  year = {2017},
  editor = {Geertje van Bergen and Jennifer Spenader},
  month = jun,
  address = {Nijmegen, Netherlands},
  organization = {Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics},
  publisher = {Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017LSA,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  title = {The president gave her inauguration speech: Explicit belief and implicit expectations in language production and comprehension},
  booktitle = {{91th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America}},
  year = {2017},
  editor = {Marlyse Baptista and Andries Coetzee},
  month = jan,
  address = {Austin, Texas},
  publisher = {Linguistic Society of America},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2009ECEM,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan},
  title = {Individual differences in scanpaths and reanalysis strategies while reading temporarily ambiguous sentences},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)}},
  year = {2009},
  editor = {Simon Liversedge},
  address = {Southampton, UK},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  venue = {University of Southampton}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2010CUNY,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan},
  title = {Reanalysis strategies in temporarily ambiguous sentence -- {A} scanpath analysis},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 23th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2010},
  editor = {Douglas Bemis and Jon Brennan and Suzanne Dikker and Inna Livitz and Alec Marantz and Brian McElree and Liina Pylkkänen and Hugh Rabagliati},
  pages = {32},
  address = {New York City, NY, USA},
  publisher = {New York University},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2011XSymp,
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  author = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Shravan Vasishth},
  title = {Strategies for dealing with attachment ambiguities in {Spanish}},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of Psycholinguistics}},
  year = {2011},
  address = {San Sebastián, Spain},
  organization = {{Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language}},
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2013AMLaP,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {World-knowledge violations elicit different rhythmic brain activity in natural reading and serial presentation},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 19th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference ({AMLaP})}},
  year = {2013},
  editor = {Cheryl Frenck-Mestre and F-Xavier Alario and Noël Nguyen and Philippe Blache and Christine Meunier},
  pages = 32,
  address = {Marseilles, France},
  publisher = {Aix-Marseille Université},
  abstract = {Recent studies (Dimigen et al., JEP:G, 2011; Kretzschmar et al., NeuroReport, 2009) demonstrated the feasibility of investigating fixation-related potentials (FRPs) and that the results are similar to brain potentials recorded during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). We conducted an experiment to assess if this correspondence also holds for rhythmic brain activity. To pit our results against ults gained with RSVP, the experiment used sentences that are known to produce reliable effects both in the time domain and in the frequency domain (Hagoort, Science, 2004). Participants (N=48) read freely through true ('The Thames flows through London') and false statements ('The Hudson flows through London'). Hagoort et al. report an N400, a negative-going deflection in the ERP with a peak around 400 ms, as well as increased theta (4-7 Hz) and gamma (30-70 Hz) activity. During our experiment, participants' eye movements were monitored and their EEG was recorded from 32 electrodes and later evaluated contingent to the first fixation on the critical word. We analyzed the canonical eye-tracking measures with linear mixed-effects models and the EEG with cluster-permutation tests (Maris \& Oostenveld, J Neurosci Methods, 2007) to control for multiple comparisons. As expected, we observed a negativity in the FRP with a centro-parietal distribution and a peak latency of approximately 400 ms. Also as expected, this N400 lined up with increased first fixation durations, gaze durations, and regression rates in the eye movement record (Dambacher \& Kliegl, Brain Res, 2007). Crucially, fixation-related power spectra showed synchronization in the delta range (1-3 Hz) at central electrodes and desynchronization in the upper alpha range (11-13 Hz) at occipito-parietal sites relative to a pre-fixation baseline. None of these effects is reported by Hagoort et al. which suggests that fixation-related EEG changes are at least not fully comparable to those observed in RSVP. One reason for the diverging results could lie in different processing demands: In RSVP, readers must retrieve earlier parts of the sentence from working memory because they cannot make regressions. Increased theta activity reflects this more effortful memory access (Klimesch, Brain Res Rev, 1999). In natural reading, readers can easily move their eyes back to resolve the processing difficulty which facilitates memory access. Our findings question the comparability of results acquired with serial presentation vs. natural reading.}
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2013ECEM,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {Oscillatory brain dynamics differ between natural reading and serial presentation},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)}},
  year = {2013},
  editor = {Holmqvist, Kenneth and Mulvey, F. and Johansson, Roger},
  pages = {187},
  address = {Lund, Sweden},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  keywords = {co-registration, erp, eeg, eye movements, n400},
  abstract = {Recent research (Dimigen et al., JEP:G, 2011; Kretzschmar et al., NeuroReport, 2009) shows that fixation-related potentials (FRPs) yield similar results as brain potentials recorded during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). We conducted an experiment to see if this correspondence also holds for oscillatory brain dynamics. Participants (N=48) read true ("The Thames flows through London") and false factual statements ("The Hudson flows through London"). Such violations are known to elicit an N400, a negative-going deflection with a peak around 400 ms, and increased theta and gamma activity (Hagoort, Science, 2004). As expected, we see an N400 in the FRP and increased fixation durations and regression rates in the eye movement record. Moreover, a cluster-permutation test (Maris \& Oostenveld, J Neurosci Methods, 2007) for fixation-related power spectra shows synchronization in the delta range (1-3 Hz) and desynchronization in the upper alpha range (11-13 Hz) but no theta or gamma effects. This is at odds with prior findings and suggests that fixation-related oscillatory EEG changes are not fully comparable to those observed in RSVP. One reason for the diverging results may lie in different processing demands: In RSVP, readers must retrieve earlier parts of the sentence from memory because they cannot make regressions.},
  venue = {Lund University}
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2014CUNY,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {The relationship between regressive saccades and the {P600} effect: {Evidence} from concurrent eye movement and {EEG} recordings},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 27th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2014},
  editor = {Nikole Patson and Shari Speer and Lauren Squires and Rory Turnbull and Laura Wagner and Abby Walker},
  address = {Columbus, OH, USA},
  publisher = {Ohio State University},
}
@inproceedings{MeziereEtAl2020SSSR,
  author = {Diane Mézière and Lili Yu and Erik Reichle and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Genevieve McArthur},
  title = {A comparison of three reading comprehension tests using eye movements},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading}},
  year = {2020},
  editor = {Carol Connor},
  address = {Irvine, CA 92616-5999 USA},
  publisher = {Society for the Scientific Study of Reading},
}
@inproceedings{MorganEtAl2018AMLaPAsia,
  author = {Morgan, Adam and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Victor Ferreira and Eva Wittenberg},
  title = {This is the structure that we wonder why anyone produces it: {Resumptive} pronouns in {English} hinder comprehension},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 1th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference - {Asia}}},
  year = {2018},
  editor = {Martin Pickering and Matthew Crocker and Robert Hartsuiker and Vic Ferreira and Holly Branagan and Ramesh Mishra},
  month = feb,
  address = {Hyderabad, Telangana, India},
  publisher = {University of Hyderabad},
  keywords = {resumption, pronouns, syntactic islands, filler-gap},
}
@inproceedings{PaapeEtAl2013CUNY,
  author = {Paape, Dario and Vasishth, Shravan and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Local coherence and digging-in effects in German},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 26th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2013},
  editor = {Fernanda Ferreira and Amit Almor and den Ouden, Dirk-Bart},
  pages = {199},
  address = {Columbia, SC, USA},
  publisher = {University of South Carolina},
}
@inproceedings{ParshinaEtAl2020AMLaP,
  author = {Olga Parshina and Irina Sekerina and Lopukhina, Anastasiya and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Reading Strategies in Monolingual Adults and Children vs. Bilingual Heritage and L2 Speakers of {Russian}: A Scanpath analysis},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference ({AMLaP})}},
  year = {2020},
  editor = {{von der Malsburg}, Titus and Shravan Vasishth and Isabelle Wartenburger},
  month = sep,
  address = {Potsdam, Germany},
  publisher = {Universität Potsdam},
  keywords = {scanpaths, reading, Russian, heritage speakers, L2 speakers, children, reading strategies},
}
@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2016Psychonomics,
  author = {Schotter, Liz and Leinenger, Mallorie and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Dissociating Influences of Parafoveal and Foveal Information on Reading: {Forced} Fixations and Comprehension.},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 21th Conference of the Psychonomic Society}},
  year = {2016},
  editor = {Ruth Maki},
  month = nov,
  address = {Boston, Massachusetts},
  publisher = {Psychonomic Society},
}
@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2017CUNY,
  author = {Schotter, Elizabeth and Leinenger, Mallorie and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Parafoveal and foveal information serve different purposes in reading: Parafoveal is used for saccade programming, foveal for comprehension},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 30th Annual {CUNY} Conference on Human Sentence Processing}},
  year = {2017},
  editor = {Edward Gibson and Idan Blank and Evelina Fedorenko and Richard Futrell and Melissa Kline and Rachel Ryskin},
  month = mar,
  address = {Boston, MA, USA},
  publisher = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
  keywords = {reading, oculomotor control, parafoveal preview, lexical access},
}
@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2017ECEM,
  author = {Schotter, Liz and Leinenger, Mallorie and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {The impact of forced fixations on word recognition: Dissociation of oculomotor behavior and linguistic processing},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)}},
  year = {2017},
  editor = {Heiner Deubel and Antje Nuthmann and Susanna Martinez-Conde and Ralph Radach and Stefan Everling and Ulrich Ettinger},
  month = aug,
  address = {Wuppertal, Germany},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  venue = {Bergische Universität Wuppertal},
}
@inproceedings{StoneEtAl2019PIPP,
  author = {Kate Stone and Shravan Vasishth and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Comprehenders generate long-distance predictions during reading: ERP evidence from verb-particle constructions},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of Psycholinguistics in {Iceland} -- Parsing and Prediction}},
  year = {2019},
  editor = {Matthew Whelpton and Joseph Jalbert and Alan Beretta and Sigríður Sigurjónsdóttir and Þórhallur Eyþórsson and Ómar Jóhannesson and Alec Shaw and Íris Edda Nowenstein},
  address = {Reykjavík, Iceland},
  publisher = {University of Iceland},
}
@inproceedings{ParshinaEtAl2021ISB,
  author = {Olga Parshina and Irina Sekerina and Lopukhina, Anastasiya and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Monolingual and Heritage Bilingual Strategies in Reading in {Russian}},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Bilingualism ({ISB13})}},
  year = {2021},
  editor = {Agnieszka Andrychowicz-Trojanowska and Ilona Banasiak and Silvia Bonacchi and Anna Borowska and Marta Kaliska and Dominik Kudła and Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Edyta Maciejak and Katarzyna Malesa and Magdalena Olpińska-Szkiełko and Piotr Romanowski and Małgorzata Szupica-Pyrzanowska and Magda Żelazowska-Sobczyk},
  month = jul,
  address = {Warsaw, Poland},
  publisher = {University of Warsaw},
  keywords = {scanpaths, reading, Russian, heritage speakers, L2 speakers, children, reading strategies},
}
@inproceedings{MeziereEtAl2021SSSRa,
  author = {Diane Mézière and Lili Yu and Erik Reichle and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Genevieve McArthur},
  title = {Using eye movements to predict reading comprehension scores},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading}},
  year = {2021},
  editor = {Kate Cain and Clare Wood and Jessie Ricketts and Lesly Wade-Woolley},
  publisher = {Society for the Scientific Study of Reading},
}
@inproceedings{PoppelsEtAl2021AMLaP,
  author = {Till Poppels and Veronica Boyce and Chelsea Ajunwa and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Roger Levy},
  title = {Bias against "she" pronouns can be rapidly overcome by changing event expectations},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 27th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference ({AMLaP})}},
  year = {2021},
  editor = {Giuseppina Turco and Gabriel Thiberge and Céline Pozniak and Till Poppels and Barbara Hemforth and Saveria Colonna and Anne Abeillé},
  month = sep,
  address = {Paris, France},
  publisher = {Université de Paris},
  keywords = {implicit bias, linguistic bias, reference, gender stereotypes},
}
@inproceedings{MorganEtAl2018CAMP,
  author = {Morgan, Adam and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Ferreira, Victor and Wittenberg, Eva},
  title = {This is the Structure that We Wonder Why Anyone Produces it: {Resumptive} Pronouns in {English} Hinder Sentence Comprehension},
  booktitle = {{California Meeting on Psycholinguistics ({CAMP})}},
  year = {2018},
  address = {Los Angeles, USA},
  publisher = {UC Los Angeles},
  editors = {Elsi Kaiser and Jesse Harris},
}
@inproceedings{LaurinvichyuteMalsburg2021LISP,
  author = {Laurinavichyute, Anna and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {Agreement attraction in grammatical sentences arises only in the good-enough processing mode},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of Linguistic Illusions in Sentence Processing 2021}},
  year = {2021},
  address = {Konstanz, Germany},
  organization = {Universität Konstanz},
  editors = {Anna Czypionka and Theo Marinis},
}
@inproceedings{PankratzEtAl2022DGfS,
  author = {Elizabeth Pankratz and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Shravan Vasishth},
  title = {An entropy-based approach to measuring morphological productivity},
  booktitle = {{44st Annual Conference of the German Linguistic Society}},
  year = {2022},
  editor = {Claudia Maienborn and Maria Averintseva-Klisch},
  month = feb,
  address = {Tübingen, Germany},
  organization = {University of Tübingen},
}
@inproceedings{MeziereEtAl2022ECEM,
  author = {Diane Mézière and Lili Yu and Erik Reichle and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Genevieve McArthur},
  title = {Scanpath regularity as a predictor of performance on reading comprehension assessments},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 21th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)}},
  year = {2022},
  editor = {Doug Barrett and Vicky McGowan and Ascension Pagan and Kevin Paterson and Frank Proudlock and David Souto and Mervyn Thomas},
  address = {Leicester, England},
  publisher = {University of Leicester},
}
@inproceedings{MeziereEtAl2022SIG27,
  author = {Diane Mézière and Lili Yu and Erik Reichle and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Genevieve McArthur},
  title = {Scanpath regularity as a measure of reading comprehension ability},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the EARLI Special Interest Group on Online Measures of Learning Processes (SIG27)}},
  year = {2022},
  editor = {Nora McIntyre and Ian Coombs and Amy Peters and Tiina Törmänen and Leen Catrysse},
  address = {Southampton, England},
  publisher = {University of Southampton},
}
@inproceedings{MeziereEtAl2023SSSR,
  author = {Diane Mézière and Lili Yu and Erik Reichle and {von der Malsburg}, Titus and Genevieve McArthur},
  title = {Predicting recall performance from eye movements during normal reading},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading}},
  year = {2023},
  editor = {Genevieve McArthur and Anne Castles and Rauno Parrila},
  address = {Port Douglas, Queensland, Australia},
  publisher = {Society for the Scientific Study of Reading},
}
@inproceedings{LaurinavichyuteEtAl2023AMLaP,
  author = {Anna Laurinavichyute and Himanshu Yadav and {von der Malsburg, Titus} and Shravan Vasishth},
  title = {The role of goal in sentence processing},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the 29th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference ({AMLaP})}},
  year = {2023},
  editor = {Manuel Carreiras and Clara Martin and Antje Stoehr and Ileana Quiñones and Sinona Mancini and Amaia Carrión-Castillo and Efthymia Kapnoula and Brendan Costello},
  address = {San Sebastián, Spain},
  publisher = {Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language},
  venue = {San Sebastián, Spain},
  abstract = {The role of goal has largely been ignored in sentence processing research, presumably because (morpho-)syntactic processing is assumed to be invariant to goal, which is not necessarily true. In a series of four single-trial self-paced reading experiments manipulating task and sentence grammaticality, we show that: 1) in grammatical sentences like 1a and 1b, no effect is observed at the verb when participants expect to answer comprehension questions, but a slowdown in condition 1b (attraction effect) arises when participants expect to judge acceptability; 2) in ungrammatical sentences like 1c and 1d, agreement attraction (speedup at the verb+1 in 1d) is present irrespective of the task, but the effect changes direction at the verb+2 when participants expect to judge sentence acceptability. Typically-observed reading time effects (attraction in 1c vs. 1d, no effect in 1a vs. 1b) occur when the goal is answering comprehension questions but disappear when the goal is acceptability judgment. Instead, judgment-typical effects appear. Overall, agreement attraction demonstrates a surprising degree of task-dependency.  1. (a) The candidate that the lobbyist openly supports ...  (b) The candidates that the lobbyist openly supports ...  (c) The candidate that the lobbyist openly *support ...  (d) The candidates that the lobbyist openly *support ...}
}
@inproceedings{RanjanMalsburg2024LE,
  author = {Ranjan, Sidharth and {von der Malsburg}, Titus},
  title = {A Bounded Rationality Account of Constituent Order in {SOV} languages},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of Linguistic Evidence 2024}},
  year = {2024},
  month = feb,
  editor = {Doreen Georgi and Isabell Wartenburger and Adamantios Gafos and Andreas Hölzl and Raúl Bendezú Araujo},
  address = {Potsdam, Germany},
  organization = {Collaborative Research Center 1287: Limits of Variability in Language},
  publisher = {University of Potsdam},
}