talks.bib

@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2016Psychonomics,
  author = {Schotter, Liz and Leinenger, Mallory and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {Dissociating Influences of Parafoveal and Foveal Information on Reading: {Forced} Fixations and Comprehension.},
  editor = {Ruth Maki},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21th Conference of the Psychonomic Scociety},
  year = {2016},
  publisher = {Psychonomic Society},
  address = {Boston, Massachusetts}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017LSA,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  title = {The president gave her inauguration speech: Explicit belief and implicit expectations in language production and comprehension},
  editor = {Marlyse Baptista and Andries Coetzee},
  booktitle = {91th Annual Meeting of the Linguistics Society of America},
  year = {2017},
  month = jan,
  publisher = {Linguistic Society of America},
  address = {Austin, Texas}
}
@inproceedings{AngeleMalsburg2016Psychonomics,
  author = {Bernhard Angele and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {Multiple Comparisons and False Positive Rates in Eye Tracking Studies of Reading Behaviour},
  year = {2016},
  pages = 112,
  editor = {Bajo, Maria Teresa},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the International Meeting of the Psychonomic Society},
  publisher = {Psychonomic Society},
  address = {Granada, Spain}
}
@inproceedings{AngeleMalsburg2015Psychonomics,
  author = {Bernhard Angele and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {Multiple comparisons and false positive rates in eye tracking studies of reading behavior},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the Pre-Psychonomics Word Recognition Conference},
  year = {2015},
  editor = {Pablo Gomez and William Krenzer},
  address = {Chicago, IL, USA},
  organization = {DePaul University, Chicago},
  publisher = {DePaul University, Chicago},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgAngele2015AMLaP,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Angele, Bernhard},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {The rules of statistics make no exception for reading research: {False} positive rates in eyetracking studies of reading behavior},
  keywords = {reading, method, false positives, bonferroni correction},
  editor = {Albert Gatt and Holger Mitterer},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 21th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP)},
  year = {2015},
  publisher = {University of Malta},
  address = {Valetta, Malta}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgAngele2015SymPsych,
  author = {Angele, Bernhard and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {False-positive rates in eyetracking studies with multiple dependent measures},
  keywords = {reading, method, false positives, bonferroni correction},
  editor = {Perea, Manuel and Vergara-Martínez, Marta and Rosa Martínez, Eva M. and Tejero, Pilar and Roca Ruíz, Javier and Fajardo, Inmaculada and Salmerón, Ladislao and Abu Mallouh, Reem},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 12th Symposium of Psycholinguistics},
  year = {2015},
  publisher = {Universitat de Valencia},
  address = {Valencia, Spain}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2009ECEM,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {Individual differences in scanpaths and reanalysis strategies while reading temporarily ambiguous sentences},
  editor = {Simon Liversedge},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)},
  year = {2009},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  address = {Southampton, UK},
  venue = {University of Southampton}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2010CUNY,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {Reanalysis strategies in temporarily ambiguous sentence -- {A} scanpath analysis},
  pages = {32},
  editor = {Douglas Bemis and Jon Brennan and Suzanne Dikker and Inna Livitz and Alec Marantz and Brian McElree and Liina Pylkkänen and Hugh Rabagliati},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 23th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing},
  year = {2010},
  publisher = {New York University},
  address = {New York City, NY, USA}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2012Coling,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Shravan Vasishth and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {Scanpaths in reading are informative about sentence processing},
  year = {2012},
  pages = {37--53},
  address = {Mumbai, India},
  booktitle = {{Proceedings of the First Workshop on Eye-tracking and Natural Language Processing}},
  editor = {Michael Carl, Pushpak Bhattacharya and Kamal Kumar Choudhary},
  publisher = {The COLING 2012 organizing committee},
  url = {https://tmalsburg.github.io/publications/MalsburgEtAl2012Coling.pdf},
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2014CUNY,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and von der Malsburg, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {The relationship between regressive saccades and the {P600} effect: {Evidence} from concurrent eye movement and {EEG} recordings},
  editor = {Nikole Patson and Shari Speer and Lauren Squires and Rory Turnbull and Laura Wagner and Abby Walker},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 27th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing},
  year = {2014},
  publisher = {Ohio State University},
  address = {Columbus, OH, USA}
}
@inproceedings{PaapeEtAl2013CUNY,
  author = {Paape, Dario and Vasishth, Shravan and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {Local coherence and digging-in effects in German},
  pages = {199},
  editor = {Fernanda Ferreira and Amit Almor and den Ouden, Dirk-Bart },
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 26th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing},
  year = {2013},
  publisher = {University of South Carolina},
  address = {Columbia, SC, USA}
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2013AMLaP,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and von der Malsburg, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {World-knowledge violations elicit different rhythmic brain activity in natural reading and serial presentation},
  pages = 32,
  abstract = {Recent studies (Dimigen et al., JEP:G, 2011; Kretzschmar et al., NeuroReport, 2009) demonstrated the feasibility of investigating fixation-related potentials (FRPs) and that the results are similar to brain potentials recorded during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). We conducted an experiment to assess if this correspondence also holds for rhythmic brain activity. To pit our results against ults gained with RSVP, the experiment used sentences that are known to produce reliable effects both in the time domain and in the frequency domain (Hagoort, Science, 2004). Participants (N=48) read freely through true ('The Thames flows through London') and false statements ('The Hudson flows through London'). Hagoort et al. report an N400, a negative-going deflection in the ERP with a peak around 400 ms, as well as increased theta (4-7 Hz) and gamma (30-70 Hz) activity. During our experiment, participants' eye movements were monitored and their EEG was recorded from 32 electrodes and later evaluated contingent to the first fixation on the critical word. We analyzed the canonical eye-tracking measures with linear mixed-effects models and the EEG with cluster-permutation tests (Maris \& Oostenveld, J Neurosci Methods, 2007) to control for multiple comparisons. As expected, we observed a negativity in the FRP with a centro-parietal distribution and a peak latency of approximately 400 ms. Also as expected, this N400 lined up with increased first fixation durations, gaze durations, and regression rates in the eye movement record (Dambacher \& Kliegl, Brain Res, 2007). Crucially, fixation-related power spectra showed synchronization in the delta range (1-3 Hz) at central electrodes and desynchronization in the upper alpha range (11-13 Hz) at occipito-parietal sites relative to a pre-fixation baseline. None of these effects is reported by Hagoort et al. which suggests that fixation-related EEG changes are at least not fully comparable to those observed in RSVP. One reason for the diverging results could lie in different processing demands: In RSVP, readers must retrieve earlier parts of the sentence from working memory because they cannot make regressions. Increased theta activity reflects this more effortful memory access (Klimesch, Brain Res Rev, 1999). In natural reading, readers can easily move their eyes back to resolve the processing difficulty which facilitates memory access. Our findings question the comparability of results acquired with serial presentation vs. natural reading.},
  editor = {Cheryl Frenck-Mestre and F-Xavier Alario and Noël Nguyen and Philippe Blache and Christine Meunier},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLaP)},
  year = {2013},
  publisher = {Aix-Marseille Université},
  address = {Marseilles, France}
}
@inproceedings{MetznerEtAl2013ECEM,
  author = {Metzner, Paul and von der Malsburg, Titus and Vasishth, Shravan and Rösler, Frank},
  title = {Oscillatory brain dynamics differ between natural reading and serial presentation},
  pages = {187},
  keywords = {co-registration, erp, eeg, eye movements, n400},
  abstract = {Recent research (Dimigen et al., JEP:G, 2011; Kretzschmar et al., NeuroReport, 2009) shows that fixation-related potentials (FRPs) yield similar results as brain potentials recorded during rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP). We conducted an experiment to see if this correspondence also holds for oscillatory brain dynamics. Participants (N=48) read true ("The Thames flows through London") and false factual statements ("The Hudson flows through London"). Such violations are known to elicit an N400, a negative-going deflection with a peak around 400 ms, and increased theta and gamma activity (Hagoort, Science, 2004). As expected, we see an N400 in the FRP and increased fixation durations and regression rates in the eye movement record. Moreover, a cluster-permutation test (Maris \& Oostenveld, J Neurosci Methods, 2007) for fixation-related power spectra shows synchronization in the delta range (1-3 Hz) and desynchronization in the upper alpha range (11-13 Hz) but no theta or gamma effects. This is at odds with prior findings and suggests that fixation-related oscillatory EEG changes are not fully comparable to those observed in RSVP. One reason for the diverging results may lie in different processing demands: In RSVP, readers must retrieve earlier parts of the sentence from memory because they cannot make regressions.},
  editor = {Holmqvist, Kenneth and Mulvey, F. and Johansson, Roger},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)},
  year = {2013},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  address = {Lund, Sweden},
  venue = {Lund University}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2013ECEM_scanpaths,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Shravan Vasishth and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {Scanpaths in reading are tractable and informative},
  pages = {132},
  keywords = {scanpaths, reading, sentence processing},
  abstract = {Pioneering work in reading research has shown that scanpaths in reading can be informative about sentences processing (Frazier, Rayner, 1982). Nevertheless, scanpaths have not gained much traction in reading research. One reason for that may have been a lack of suitable analytical tools. Here, we summarize three recent studies in which we used a new scanpath measure to analyze gaze data from two experimental studies (von der Malsburg, Vasishth, 2011, 2012) and one corpus study (von der Malsburg, Kliegl, Vasishth, under revision). The experiments investigated how readers process temporarily ambiguous sentences. We showed that readers do not always commit to one of the alternative interpretations, and that readers with low working-memory capacity do so less often. Contrary to what was reported earlier, we found that reparsing instead of targeted repair is a common strategy to recover from incorrect interpretations. Interestingly, these results did not emerge in an analysis using traditional word-based eyetracking measures showing their limitations. In the corpus study, we demonstrated how syntax, oculomotor constraints, and age of reader jointly determine the regularity of scanpaths. We argue that, taken together, these results establish the scanpath as an informative and tractable object of investigation in reading research.},
  editor = {Holmqvist, Kenneth and Mulvey, F. and Johansson, Roger},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)},
  year = {2013},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  address = {Lund, Sweden},
  venue = {Lund University}
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgVasishth2011XSymp,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Shravan Vasishth},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {Strategies for dealing with attachment ambiguities in {Spanish}},
  year = {2011},
  address = {San Sebastián, Spain},
  organization = {{Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language}},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 10th Symposium of Psycholinguistics},
}
@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2017CUNY,
  author = {Schotter, Elizabeth and Leinenger, Mallorie and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {Parafoveal and foveal information serve different purposes in reading: Parafoveal is used for saccade programming, foveal for comprehension},
  keywords = {reading, oculomotor control, parafoveal preview, lexical access},
  editor = {Edward Gibson and Idan Blank and Evelina Fedorenko and Richard Futrell and Melissa Kline and Rachel Ryskin},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 30th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing},
  year = {2017},
  month = mar,
  publisher = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
  address = {Boston, MA, USA},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017CUNY,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {The president will give her inauguration speech: Explicit belief and implicit expectations in language production and comprehension},
  keywords = {sentence processing, language production, gender stereotypes, pronouns, expectation},
  editor = {Edward Gibson and Idan Blank and Evelina Fedorenko and Richard Futrell and Melissa Kline and Rachel Ryskin},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 30th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing},
  year = {2017},
  month = mar,
  publisher = {Massachusetts Institute of Technology},
  address = {Boston, MA, USA},
}
@inproceedings{MalsburgEtAl2017DETEC,
  author = {von der Malsburg, Titus and Poppels, Till and Levy, Roger},
  sortname = {Malsburg},
  title = {The president gave her inauguration speech. {No}, they didn’t! {The} interaction of explicit world knowledge, implicit gender stereotypes, and discourse expectations},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of {Discourse Expectations: Theoretical, Experimental and Computational perspectives (DETEC 2017)}},
  year = {2017},
  month = jun,
  editor = {Geertje van Bergen and Jennifer Spenader},
  address = {Nijmegen, Netherlands},
  organization = {Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics},
  publisher = {Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics},
}
@inproceedings{SchotterEtAl2017ECEM,
  venue = {Bergische Universität Wuppertal},
  address = {Wuppertal, Germany},
  publisher = {Journal of Eye Movement Research},
  month = aug,
  year = {2017},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Eye Movements (ECEM)},
  editor = {Heiner Deubel and Antje Nuthmann and Susanna Martinez-Conde and Ralph Radach and Stefan Everling and Ulrich Ettinger},
  author = {Schotter, Liz and Leinenger, Mallorie and von der Malsburg, Titus},
  title = {The impact of forced fixations on word recognition: Dissociation ofoculomotor behavior and linguistic processing},
}
@inproceedings{MorganEtAl2018AMLaPAsia,
  author = {Morgan, Adam and von der Malsburg, Titus and Victor Ferreira and Eva Wittenberg},
  title = {This is the structure that we wonder why anyone produces it: {Resumptive} pronouns in {English} hinder comprehension},
  keywords = {resumption, pronouns, syntactic islands, filler-gap},
  editor = {Martin Pickering and Matthew Crocker and Robert Hartsuiker and Vic Ferreira and Holly Branagan and Ramesh Mishra},
  booktitle = {Proceedings of the 1th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference - Asia},
  year = {2018},
  month = {feb},
  publisher = {University of Hyderabad},
  address = {Hyderabad, Telangana, India},
}

This file was generated by bibtex2html 1.97.